Showing posts with label IP Licensing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label IP Licensing. Show all posts

Sunday, September 4, 2011

LTE Devices, Patent War, and Patent Pool


According to GSA (Global mobile Suppliers Association) there were 45 manufacturers for 161 LTE-enabled user devices as of July 2011: http://www.gsacom.com/news/gsa_336.php4.
LTE user devices are Modules, Tablets, Notebooks/netbooks, PC Cards, Smartphones, Routers, and USB dongles.

Among 45 manufacturers, only 9 manufacturers - Ericsson, Huawei, LG, Motorola, NEC, Qualcomm, RIM, Samsung, and ZTE - were LTE essential patents shareholders based on TechIPm's LTE patent analysis:

To find the key IPR holders for the LTE patents, a keyword search of the USPTO patent data base has been performed. For completeness, patent data in the lists of patents declared essential to 3GPP LTE appear at the ETSI IPR Online website is also included. More than 1,400 LTE related patents, issued and published applications in the US as of Aug. 31, 2011, are analyzed to find essential patent candidates for LTE RAN (Radio Access Network) standards. To evaluate the essentiality of a LTE patent, patent disclosures in claim and detail description for each LTE patent are compared to the final versions of the 3GPP Release 8 technical specifications. Total of 184 patents are identified as the potential candidates for LTE RAN essential patent. The LTE IPR shareholders for essential patent candidates are Ericsson, ETRI, Freescale, Huawei, InterDigital, LG, Motorola, NEC, Nokia, Nortel, NSN, Qualcomm, RIM, Samsung, TI, and ZTE.

How about other 36 manufacturers? Are they free from patent lawsuit?

Recently, NGMN Board recommended that all stakeholders should participate in an effective LTE patent pool formation to avoid further delays in LTE licensing: http://www.lteportal.com/MediaChannel/Articles/LTE__LTE-Advanced;6/Regulation,_Standards,_Spectrum;31/NGMN_Board_Recommendation_on_LTE_Patent_Pool;2621?1&PHPSESSID=5fa3ddd96ac550ca5ac597f0a6b21909.

Who will be key players for the LTE patent pool?, Are there enough essential patents for the pool?

For details, please refer LTE Essential Patent Candidates Data:

LTE Essential Patent Candidates Data is the TechIPm's product based on LTE patents research for US market leader among LTE UE (cellular phones, smart phones, PDAs, mobile PCs, etc.) and base station (eNB) product manufactures. LTE Essential Patent Candidates Data provides assignee, patent number, related 3GPP TS36 specifications, and the key technology components for an implementation of the products.
For details about the product, please contact Alex Lee at alexglee@techipm.com


©2011 TechIPm, LLC All Rights Reserved
http://www.techipm.com/

Saturday, September 3, 2011

Samsung's Mistake for InterDigital's Patents Acquisition


According to a S. Korea's news media, Seoul Economic Daily, Samsung finally decided that it will not participate in auction for InterDigital's patents: http://economy.hankooki.com/lpage/industry/201108/e20110819164352120250.htm.

After Apple's acquisition of Nortel's patents, Samsung had expressed that it is interested in bidding for InterDigital's patents:http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-may-bid-on-interdigital-patent-portfolio-according-to-source-03169241/.

Samsung told to the media that there will be more lost then benefit for buying the patents because of price bubble in InterDigital's patents. It may be true if Samsung do not consider its strong competitor- Apple.

According to TechIPm's analysis for LTE patents, some part of InterDigita's LTE patent portfolio have a relative competitiveness over Samsung's, and it may be a good tool to Apple to attack Samsung, if it acquires InterDigital's patents.

TechIPm, LLC (http://www.techipm.com/) provides patent portfolio evaluation service for patent due diligence in mobile business acquisition. LTE patent portfolio evaluation can provide the followings.

1. What is the quality of the LTE patent portfolio?
2. What are the strengths/weaknesses of the LTE patent portfolio?
3. Comparative analysis among the patent portfolios (e.g. InterDigital v. Samsung).
4. Who is the best candidate for mobile business acquisition considering the business integration and/or compatibility?
5.What are the potential risks considering the possible patent lawsuits?

For more information, please contact Alex Lee at alexglee@techipm.com .


©2011 TechIPm, LLC All Rights Reserved
http://www.techipm.com/

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

InterDigital Patent Acquisition Strategic Options

Following the recent big deal regarding Nortel's patents and Motorola's patents, InterDigital's patents are scheduled to be the next big acquisition deal.

As to the seller, it is a good opportunity considering the uncertainty of future money making power in emerging LTE licensing market: InterDigital's licensing power in LTE is expected to be weaker compare to the situations in 2G and 3G based on TechIPm's LTE essential patent analysis over the past 3 years.

As to the buyers, it is also a good opportunity not only to make up their current LTE patent portfolio but also to get additional cash flow source through the existing InterDigital's licensing agreement.

TechIPm, LLC (http://www.techipm.com/) provides patent portfolio evaluation service for patent due diligence in mobile business acquisition. LTE patent portfolio evaluation can provide the followings.

1. What is the quality of the LTE patent portfolio?
2. What are the strengths/weaknesses of the LTE patent portfolio?
3. Comparative analysis among the patent portfolios (e.g. InterDigital v. Motorola).
4. Who are the best candidate for mobile business acquisition considering the business integration and/or compatibility?
5.What are the potential risks considering the possible patent lawsuits?

For more information, please contact Alex Lee at alexglee@techipm.com .


©2011 TechIPm, LLC All Rights Reserved
http://www.techipm.com/

Saturday, August 14, 2010

Qualcomm's LTE Patent Governance

Qualcomm have enjoyed the governance in patents on the Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) technology it pioneered. As every 3G network uses CDMA technology, Qualcomm was able to license its patents in exchange for a royalty payment that's 4-5% of selling prices on 3G enabled phones.


Recently TechIPm LLC researched LTE patent portfolios for US market leader among LTE UE (cellular phones, smart phones, PDAs, mobile PCs, etc.) and base station (eNB) product manufactures. Total of 1250 LTE patents, issued and published applications in the US as of May 31 2010, are analyzed to find essential patent candidates for LTE RAN (Radio Access Network) standards. To evaluate the essentiality of a LTE patent, patent disclosures in claim and detail description for each LTE patent are compared to the final versions of the 3GPP Release 8 technical specifications.


Total of 72 patents are identified as the potential candidates for LTE baseband modem essential IPR and total of 62 patents are identified as the potential candidates for LTE protocol SW essential IPR. As for the essential IPR share in baseband modem products, Qualcomm (27 %) is the leader followed by Samsung (18%), LG (18%), InterDigital (7%), Nokia (7%), Motorola (6%), and TI (6%) and as for the essential IPR share in protocol SW products, LG (43 %) is the leader followed by InterDigital (19%), Qualcomm (18%), and Nokia (16%) as of May 31 2010.

The top 5 IPR shareholders - InterDigital, LG, Nokia, Qualcomm, and Samsung (total IPR share of 87%) - are appeared as the key member candidates for a successful LTE patent pool formation and operation.


Top 5 LTE essential IP shareholders’ patent portfolios, classified by the key technology components for an implementation of the LTE baseband modem, are compared to excess the innovation competitiveness. Qualcomm’s patent portfolio was distributed among all the key technology components for an implementation of the LTE baseband modem.


Among the total of 134 identified patents as the potential candidates for LTE RAN essential IP only 7 candidates are the issued patents. As the prosecution for the published applications is an ongoing process, it is necessary to watch for a possible IP landscape change. A complete LTE RAN essential IP landscape is expected in two to three years as the current prosecution process for the published and unpublished pending patent applications are finished for a complete set of issued patent data pool.




©2010 TechIPm, LLC All Rights Reserved
http://www.techipm.com/

Saturday, July 31, 2010

InterDigital's LTE Patent Licensing Revenue

In recent InterDigital's announce for the second quarter financial result, William J. Merritt, InterDigital's President and Chief Executive Officer, commented that "We expect to continue our strong financial performance as we further expand our base of customers. In particular, we are focusing on expanding our customer base for LTE technology. We have made significant contributions to the worldwide standards bodies in several key areas of LTE technology, including power control, bandwidth on-demand, interference reduction and higher data throughput. These areas are central to the user experience and key to unlocking the potential of wireless communications," continued Mr. Merritt. "With our pioneering wireless technologies, InterDigital continues to be a leader in building innovative solutions, benefiting users, device manufacturers and operators worldwide."

To evaluate the future revinue expectation from LTE patent licensing, TechIPm, LLC researched InterDigital's LTE patent portfolio in LTE Patents for Commercial Products 2Q 2010: http://techipm-innovationfrontline.blogspot.com/2010/07/lte-essential-patent-research-report.html

Total of 134 patents are identified as the potential candidates for LTE essential patent, and InterDigital was amonng the top 5 IPR shareholders - InterDigital, LG, Nokia, Qualcomm, and Samsung (total IPR share of 87%).

Based on the research result, InterDigital's expected income from the essential IP licensing for LTE modem is roughly estimated to be about $0.07 - $0.14 billion.


©2010 TechIPm, LLC All Rights Reserved
http://www.techipm.com/

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

4G (LTE, WiMAX) IPR Strategy Seminar & Panel Discussion

As a part of PATINEX 2009, which is scheduled on Nov. 10-11 in Seoul, S. Korea, there will be a special session on Mobile technology IPR development and portfolio management especially for 4G. After short presentations by each panel, there will be an in-depth discussion about current status of 4G (LTE, Mobile WiMAX) essential patent IPRs, strategic patent portfolio development and management, and issue with licensing (patent pool) and NPEs.

Moderator : Alex G. Lee, Ph.D. (Principal, TechIPm, LLC)
Panels:
Jari Varrio, Ph.D. (IPR Director, Nokia)
James Maccoun, J.D. (Sr. Counsel, HP and former IPR Director, Motorola)
Junwon Lee (IPR Director, Samsung Electronics)
Hyeonwoo Lee, Ph.D. (NextG Mobile Program Director, Ministry of Knowledge Economy)


Panel Discussion Agenda

1. Recent trends in IPR for mobile telecommunication innovations. Are there any unique IPR characteristics in mobile telecommunication sector compare to others?

2. IPR landscape in 4G compare to 3G and 2G. What is the difference in IPR regime for LTE and Mobile WiMAX?

3. IPR for “essential patent” vs. “non-essential patent”. What is the difference in strategy?

4. Quantity or Quality. Which factor is important in patent portfolio development?

5. Best practice in strategic alignment: global IPR leaders’ experience.

6. Profit from IPR investment. How to measure the ROI?

7. Can a patent pool possible for 4G mobile? Licensing trends in mobile telecommunications compare to other IT areas. What likely be the royalty rates and is an expected role of patent pool for lowering the royalties? What is the global IPR leaders’ licensing policy and strategy?

8. Are there any IPR related matters in global trade?

9. Are there any threats from NPEs (patent trolls) in 4G? Pros and cons of NPEs in knowledge base economy. Will the harmonization and/or any kind of collaboration in patent law reform be necessary and/or effective for NPE issues?


Free Registration: http://www.patinex.org/RI/RI01E_n.jsp

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Global LTE Essential Patent Candidates 3Q 2009



As of September 30 2009, there are total of 1607 declarations for LTE essential patent candidates in the lists of ETSI IPR Online, which are issued, published, and pending patents worldwide including PCT applications.

As for the global LTE Essential Patent Candidates by Country of registration, US is the top (67%), followed by China (10%) and S. Korea (6%) as of September 30 2009.

As for the global LTE Essential Patent Candidates by Company, Qualcomm is the top (25%) followed by InterDigital (16%), Nokia (13%), Samsung (11%), Huawei (11%), and LG (9%) as of September 30 2009.

©2009 TechIPm, LLC
All Rights Reserved http://www.techipm.com/

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

LTE Essential Patent IPR Shareholders 3Q 2009 Update

As of Aug. 31 2009, there are total of 18 IPR shareholders for LTE essential patent candidates in lists of ETSI IPR Online, which are issued, published, and pending patents at the USPTO: Alcatel-Lucent, Broadcom, Ericsson, ETRI, Huawei, iCODING, InterDigital, LG, Motorola, NEC, Nokia, Nokia Siemens Networks, Nortel, Panasonic, Qualcomm, Samsung, Sony, and Texas Instruments.

Among the 18 IPR shareholders for LTE essential patent candidates, Qualcomm was the top (32%) followed by InterDigital (16%), Nokia (14%), and LG (11%) in IPR share as of Aug. 31 2009 in the US.


©2009 TechIPm, LLC All Rights Reserved
http://www.techipm.com/

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

LTE Strategic Options: Samsung+Ericsson Alliance


Based on TechIPm's recent analysis for LTE essential patent candidates among LTE mobile phone competitors (http://techipm-innovationfrontline.blogspot.com/2009/09/lte-mobile-phone-competitor-analysis.html) and among LTE infrastructure equipment competitors (http://techipm-innovationfrontline.blogspot.com/2009/09/ericssons-lte-patent-landscape.html), a possible scenario for strategic business alliance between Samsung (mobile phone manufacturer) and Ericsson (infrastructure equipment manufacturer) is analyzed.

Samsung+Ericsson's combined LTE patent portfolio for the LTE commercial product (baseband modem and protocol stack) appeared to be very competitive and complementary each other in making up the Samsung's HW oriented and Ericsson's SW oriented LTE innovations.


©2009 TechIPm, LLC All Rights Reserved
http://www.techipm.com/

Sunday, September 20, 2009

Ericsson's LTE Patent Landscape


LTE patent portfolios are researched for global market leaders in mobile infrastructure manufactures: Alcatel-Lucent, Ericsson, Huawei, and NSN. US designating essential patent candidates at the ETSI IPR Online website are analyzed. Among the four major competitors for the US LTE infrastructure market, only the Ercisson has a meaningful number of essential patent candidates for the analysis (e.g. most of Huawei's 147 LTE essential patent candidates are in China’s national stage).

Ericsson declared 24 essential patents (total of 30 candidates in TS36 specifications) out of 49 total patents (e.g. including PCT applications) for the US market as of Aug. 31 2009.

The most declared specification for the Ericsson's LTE essential patent candidates was TS36.323 (PDCP protocol specification) followed by TS36.322 (RLC protocol specification), and TS36.331 (RRC protocol specification).


©2009 TechIPm, LLC All Rights Reserved

http://www.techipm.com/

Friday, September 18, 2009

LTE Mobile Phone Competitor Analysis





LTE patent portfolios are researched for global leader in mobile phone manufactures: LG, Motorola, Nokia, and Samsung. US designating essential patent candidates at the ETSI IPR Online website are analyzed.

LG declared total of 100 essential patent candidates (Issued: 4, Published: 34, Pending: 62) as of Aug. 31 2009. Motorola declared total of 48 essential patent candidates (Issued: 48) as of Aug. 31 2009. Nokia declared total of 134 essential patent candidates (Issued: 65, Published: 59, Pending: 10) as of Aug. 31 2009. Samsung declared total of 49 essential patent candidates (Issued: 2, Published: 32, Pending: 15) as of Aug. 31 2009.

The most declared specification for the LG's LTE essential patent candidates was TS36.321 (MAC protocol specification). The most declared specification for the Motorola's, the Nokia's, and the Samsung's LTE essential patent candidates was TS36.211 (physical channels and modulation).

In the analysis for the LTE commercial product (baseband modem and protocol stack) related patents, Nokia was the leader followed by LG both in modem and protocol product related innovations.


©2009 TechIPm, LLC All Rights Reserved

http://www.techipm.com/

Thursday, September 17, 2009

Motorola's LTE Essential Patent Landscape

In addition to the total of 103 Motorola's essential patent candidates published in the United States before Aug. 1 2009, which are indentified by a keyword search, LTE patents declared essential to 3GPP LTE appear at the ETSI IPR Online website are analyzed.

Total of 48 patent declarations issued by USPTO are identified for the Motorola's LTE essential patent candidates as of Aug. 31 2009.

Top 3 most declared specifications for the Motorola's LTE essential patent candidates are TS36.211 (physical channels and modulation), TS36.213 (physical layer procedures), and TS36.300 (overall description; Stage 6).


©2009 TechIPm, LLC All Rights Reserved
http://www.techipm.com/

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

LTE Patent Portfolio as Strategic Alliance Tool: InterDigital+TI


Based on TechIPm's recent IPR analysis for LTE OFDM/MIMO standards (http://www.slideshare.net/alexglee/lteiprofdmmimo20093q ), a possible scenario for strategic business alliance between InterDigital (IP licensing company) and Texas Instruments (semiconductor chip manufacturer) is analyzed by comparing to Qualcomm's (IP licensing company + semiconductor chip manufacturer) LTE patent portfolio for LTE OFDM/MIMO standards in number of patents, technology coverage, and quality by Essentiality Index (see the figures above).

InterDigital+TI's combined LTE patent portfolio for OFDM/MIMO standards shows that the InterDigital+TI strategic alliance could be a strong competitor to Qualcomm in LTE baseband chip and IPR licensing market.


©2009 TechIPm, LLC All Rights Reserved
http://www.techipm.com/

Saturday, September 5, 2009

LTE Patent Portfolio as Strategic Business Tool



4G mobile communication, especially LTE, is one of recent hot topics among emerging technologies and high-tech business. It is easy to find increasing number of news about LTE innovation and business in the news media:

1. Verizon Wireless Completes Successful LTE 4G Data Calls In Boston And Seattle
http://news.vzw.com/news/2009/08/pr2009-08-14f.html

2. Motorola's LTE Trial In Japan
http://www.informationweek.com/news/services/data/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=219400845

3. LG, Nortel demonstrates LTE-CDMA handover
http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/lg-nortel-demonstrates-lte-cdma-handover/2009-08-25?utm_medium=rss&utm_source=rss&cmp-id=OTC-RSS-FW0

4. Samsung's LTE Innovation Leadership
http://techipm-innovationfrontline.blogspot.com/2009/09/samsungs-lte-innovation-leadership.html

One interesting point in recent LTE related news is that LTE patent portfolio is used as a strategic business tool, especially for marketing and PR purpose:

In recent press interview for “LG's Successful LTE-CDMA Handover"‎, Dr. Scott Ahn, President & CEO of LG Mobile Communications, expressed that LG will lead the 4G innovations based on about 300 LTE-related patents and experiences in leading the LTE standardization.
(http://techipm-innovationfrontline.blogspot.com/2009/08/lgs-lte-innovation-leadership.html)

Yin Weimin, President of LTE at Huawei, advertised in recent press interview that Huawei has been granted 147 Long Term Evolution (LTE) patents by the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), representing 12 percent of the total existing 1,272 LTE patents assigned by ETSI as of August 2009. He said that “The achievement reflects our pioneering vision and firm commitment to support operators worldwide as they evolve towards delivering advanced services to end-users through LTE networks”.
(http://www.ednasia.com/article-24626-huaweipullsaheadinltepatentranking-Asia.html)

Mike Lazaridis, co-CEO at Research In Motion (RIM) called Nortel's LTE patents a 'Canada's National Treasure'. (http://www.unstrung.com/document.asp?doc_id=180246)


©2009 TechIPm, LLC All Rights Reserved
http://www.techipm.com/

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

LTE Patent Landscape for OFDM/MIMO Standards


Total of 211 patents, issued and published in the United States before Sept. 1, 2009, are analyzed for LTE OFDM/MIMO innovations. The lists of patents declared essential to LTE appear at the ETSI IPR Online are used in the analysis except for Motorola’s essential patent candidates. A keyword search is used for the identification of Motorola’s essential patent candidates.

To evaluate the quality of the LTE patents for OFDM/MIMO standards, patent disclosures for each essential patent candidate are compared to the technical specifications for LTE OFDM/MIMO standards (TS36.211 V8.70).

Qualcomm, Samsung, LG, Nokia, Motorola, Nortel, Texas Instruments, InterDigital, Ericsson, ETRI, Nokia Siemens Networks, ETRI, Huawei, Sony, and NEC were the major LTE OFDM/MIMO IPR holders.

As for the most described field of technical specification, Down Link OFDM/MIMO (Section 6.3) was the top in the OFDM/MIMO essential patent candidates followed by PUCCH (Section 5.4) and PUSCH (Section 5.3).

As a measure for the essentiality of the candidates, Essentiality Index (EI) is evaluated:

EI : Criteria
E0 : Patent disclosure is nothing to do with LTE technical specifications
E1 : Patent disclosure is weakly related to LTE technical specifications
E2 : Patent disclosure is partially related to LTE technical specifications, but required further analysis
E3 : Patent disclosure is partially related to LTE technical specifications
E4 : Patent disclosure is related to LTE technical specifications overall
E5 : Patent disclosure is strongly related to LTE technical specifications

51 % of the LTE OFDM/MIMO essential patent candidates are classified as E2, E1, and E0.

49% of the LTE OFDM/MIMO essential patent candidates are classified as high value of EI for the essentiality.


©2009 TechIPm, LLC All Rights Reserved
http://www.techipm.com/

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

Texas Instruments' LTE IPR Analysis: Essential Patent Candidates for OFDM/MIMO Standards


To evaluate the quality of TI's LTE IPR for OFDM/MIMO standards, patent disclosures for each essential patent candidate are compared to the technical specifications for LTE OFDM/MIMO standards (TS36.211 V8.70). Total of 18 patents issued and published in the United States before Aug. 1 2009 in the lists of patents declared essential to LTE appear at the ETSI IPR Online are used in the analysis.

As for the most described field of technical specification, Down Link OFDM/MIMO (Section 6.3) was the top in TI's OFDM/MIMO essential patent candidates.

As a measure for the essentiality of the candidates, Essentiality Index (EI) is evaluated:

EI : Criteria
E0 : Patent disclosure is nothing to do with LTE technical specifications
E1 : Patent disclosure is weakly related to LTE technical specifications
E2 : Patent disclosure is partially related to LTE technical specifications, but required further analysis
E3 : Patent disclosure is partially related to LTE technical specifications
E4 : Patent disclosure is related to LTE technical specifications overall
E5 : Patent disclosure is strongly related to LTE technical specifications

Only 33 % of the TI's OFDM/MIMO essential patent candidates are classified as E2 and E1.

67 % (nine E3 and three E4) of the TI's OFDM/MIMO essential patent candidates are classified as high value of EI for the essentiality.


©2009 TechIPm, LLC All Rights Reserved
http://www.techipm.com/


Wednesday, August 26, 2009

Samsung's LTE IPR Analysis: Essential Patent Candidates for OFDM/MIMO Standards


To evaluate the quality of Samsung's LTE IPR for OFDM/MIMO standards, patent disclosures for each essential patent candidate are compared to the technical specifications for LTE OFDM/MIMO standards (TS36.211 V8.70). Total of 21 patent applications published in the United States before Aug. 1 2009 in the lists of patents declared essential to LTE appear at the ETSI IPR Online are used in the analysis.

As for the most described field of technical specification, Physical Uplink Control Channel (PUCCH; Section 5.4) was the top in Samsung's OFDM/MIMO essential patent candidates.

As a measure for the essentiality of the candidates, Essentiality Index (EI) is evaluated:

EI : Criteria
E0 : Patent disclosure is nothing to do with LTE technical specifications
E1 : Patent disclosure is weakly related to LTE technical specifications
E2 : Patent disclosure is partially related to LTE technical specifications, but required further analysis
E3 : Patent disclosure is partially related to LTE technical specifications
E4 : Patent disclosure is related to LTE technical specifications overall
E5 : Patent disclosure is strongly related to LTE technical specifications

Only 23 % of the Samsung's OFDM/MIMO essential patent candidates are classified as E2 and E1.

77 % (ten E3, two E4, and two E5) of the Samsung's OFDM/MIMO essential patent candidates are classified as high value of EI for the essentiality.


©2009 TechIPm, LLC All Rights Reserved
http://www.techipm.com/

Nokia's LTE IPR Analysis: Essential Patent Candidates for OFDM/MIMO Standards


To evaluate the quality of Nokia's LTE IPR for OFDM/MIMO standards, patent disclosures for each essential patent candidate are compared to the technical specifications for LTE OFDM/MIMO standards (TS36.211 V8.70). Total of 29 patents issued and published in the United States before Aug. 1 2009 in the lists of patents declared essential to LTE appear at the ETSI IPR Online are used in the analysis.

As for the most described field of technical specification, Down Link OFDM/MIMO (Section 6.3) was the top in Nokia's OFDM/MIMO essential patent candidates.

As a measure for the essentiality of the candidates, Essentiality Index (EI) is evaluated:

EI : Criteria
E0 : Patent disclosure is nothing to do with LTE technical specifications
E1 : Patent disclosure is weakly related to LTE technical specifications
E2 : Patent disclosure is partially related to LTE technical specifications, but required further analysis
E3 : Patent disclosure is partially related to LTE technical specifications
E4 : Patent disclosure is related to LTE technical specifications overall
E5 : Patent disclosure is strongly related to LTE technical specifications

41 % of the Nokia's OFDM/MIMO essential patent candidates are classified as E2 and E1.

59 % (fifteen E3 and two E4) of the Nokia's OFDM/MIMO essential patent candidates are classified as high value of EI for the essentiality.


©2009 TechIPm, LLC All Rights Reserved
http://www.techipm.com/

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

LG's LTE Innovation Leadership

In recent press interview for “LG's Successful LTE-CDMA Handover"‎, Dr. Scott Ahn, President & CEO of LG Mobile Communications, expressed that LG will lead the 4G innovations based on about 300 LTE-related patents and experiences in leading the LTE standardization.

LTE IPR analysis by TechIPm showed that LG's LTE patent portfolio is in high quality compare to other LTE IPR holders: Nearly 90 % of the LG's OFDM/MIMO essential patent candidates are classified as high value for the essentiality.

Ref: http://www.slideshare.net/alexglee/lteiprofdmmimo20093q


©2009 TechIPm, LLC All Rights Reserved
http://www.techipm.com/

Monday, August 24, 2009

Qualcomm's LTE IPR Analysis: Essential Patent Candidates for OFDM/MIMO Standards


To evaluate the quality of Qualcomm's LTE IPR for OFDM/MIMO standards, patent disclosures for each essential patent candidate are compared to the technical specifications for LTE OFDM/MIMO standards (TS36.211 V8.70). Total of 57 patents issued and published in the United States before Aug. 1 2009 in the lists of patents declared essential to LTE appear at the ETSI IPR Online are used in the analysis.

As for the most described field of technical specification, Down Link OFDM/MIMO (Section 6.3) was the top in Qualcomm's OFDM/MIMO essential patent candidates.

As a measure for the essentiality of the candidates, Essentiality Index (EI) is evaluated:

EI : Criteria
E0 : Patent disclosure is nothing to do with LTE technical specifications
E1 : Patent disclosure is weakly related to LTE technical specifications
E2 : Patent disclosure is partially related to LTE technical specifications, but required further analysis
E3 : Patent disclosure is partially related to LTE technical specifications
E4 : Patent disclosure is related to LTE technical specifications overall
E5 : Patent disclosure is strongly related to LTE technical specifications

More than half of the Qualcomm's OFDM/MIMO essential patent candidates are classified as E2, E1, and E0.

Only 37 % (sixteen E3 and five E4) of the Qualcomm's OFDM/MIMO essential patent candidates are classified as high value of EI for the essentiality.


©2009 TechIPm, LLC All Rights Reserved
http://www.techipm.com/